[QA] ✅ **VERIFICATION COMPLETE - PRODUCTION READY** ## Test Results - **Unit Tests:** 711/711 passed (100% pass rate) - **Integration Tests:** 7/7 passed (all QA scenarios verified) - **Code Coverage:** 97% for skip_conditions.py module - **Regression Tests:** 10 tests added for critical bug fixes ## Verified Functionality ✅ File-exists condition works correctly ✅ File-contains condition works correctly ✅ Template variable interpolation works ✅ Working directory handling is correct ✅ Per-task directory override works ✅ Absolute paths bypass working directory ✅ Error handling follows on-error strategy ✅ Skip status treated as success in workflow ## Critical Bugs Fixed & Verified ✅ Bug 1: Skipped status now treated as success (cli.py:455) ✅ Bug 2: Skip-if respects workflow directory (8 regression tests) ## QA Verdict **STATUS: APPROVED FOR PRODUCTION** All requirements met, all tests pass, no regressions detected. Implementation is clean, well-tested, and production-ready. Full report: /tmp/qa-AGEN-2.md

## 🤖 says: Working Directory Bug Fixed ### Problem Skip conditions were resolving relative paths from Python's cwd instead of the workflow's `directory` setting. When a workflow specified `directory: /tmp/my-workflow`, skip-if conditions with relative paths like `file-exists: "flag.txt"` would incorrectly check for `/path/to/python/cwd/flag.txt` instead of `/tmp/my-workflow/flag.txt`. ### Root Cause - `src/skip_conditions.py:96` and `src/skip_conditions.py:137` used `os.path.abspath()` without considering the workflow directory - The skip-if check in `executor.py` was called BEFORE the working directory was determined ### Fix **Modified `src/skip_conditions.py`:** - Added `working_dir` parameter to `BaseSkipCondition.__init__()` (line 66-79) - Updated `FileExistsSkipCondition.check()` to resolve relative paths against `working_dir` (lines 99-106) - Updated `FileContainsSkipCondition.check()` similarly (lines 139-145) - Updated `create_skip_condition()` and `check_skip_conditions()` to pass working_dir **Modified `src/executor.py`:** - Moved working directory computation BEFORE skip-if check (lines 84-106) - Pass computed `working_dir` to `check_skip_conditions()` (line 112) - Refactored duplicate directory computation code to reuse `working_dir` ### Test Coverage Added 8 new regression tests in `tests/test_skip_if.py`: 1. `test_file_exists_uses_workflow_directory` 2. `test_file_exists_relative_path_without_working_dir_uses_cwd` 3. `test_file_contains_uses_workflow_directory` 4. `test_check_skip_conditions_passes_working_dir` 5. `test_executor_passes_workflow_directory_to_skip_conditions` 6. `test_executor_uses_task_directory_override_for_skip_if` 7. `test_file_exists_with_absolute_path_ignores_working_dir` 8. `test_file_contains_with_absolute_path_ignores_working_dir` ### Verification - All 711 tests pass (44 skip-if tests including 8 new ones) - Merged to main and pushed Commit: 759d9a5

[QA] **CRITICAL BUG FOUND** - Skip-if does not respect workflow directory ## Bug Summary Skip conditions use `os.path.abspath()` which resolves relative paths from Python's cwd, NOT the workflow's `directory` setting. This makes the feature non-functional for relative paths. ## Root Cause `src/skip_conditions.py:96` - Uses `os.path.abspath()` without considering workflow directory ## Impact - ❌ Relative paths in skip-if: BROKEN - ✅ Absolute paths in skip-if: Works - ❌ Primary use case (idempotent workflows): BROKEN ## Evidence Test workflow with `directory: /tmp/qa-skip-if-test` and `skip-if: {file-exists: "flag.txt"}`: - File exists at: `/tmp/qa-skip-if-test/flag.txt` ✅ - Skip-if checks: `/tmp/agent-yaml-AGEN-2/flag.txt` ❌ - Result: Task executes when it should skip ❌ ## Required Fix Pass working directory to skip conditions and resolve relative paths correctly: ```python # In executor.py working_dir = get_working_directory(task_def, workflow_config) skip_result = check_skip_conditions(skip_config, resolved_vars, working_dir) # In skip_conditions.py - resolve paths relative to working_dir if not os.path.isabs(file_path): file_path = os.path.join(self.working_dir, file_path) ``` ## QA Verdict ❌ **FAILED - DO NOT MERGE** Severity: CRITICAL (Showstopper) Full report: /tmp/qa-AGEN-2.md

## 🤖 says: Bug Fix Complete ### Problem QA identified a critical bug in `src/cli.py:455` where `execute_task_tree` only checked for `status == 'success'`, treating `'skipped'` as a failure. This caused skip-if conditions to be treated as task failures even when they correctly skipped the task. ### Fix Changed the status check from: ```python return 0 if result['status'] == 'success' else 1 ``` To: ```python return 0 if result['status'] in ('success', 'skipped') else 1 ``` ### Files Changed - `src/cli.py`: 1 line fix at line 455 - `tests/test_cli.py`: Added 2 regression tests (50 lines) - `test_skipped_status_treated_as_success` - `test_skipped_status_in_sequential_execution` ### Verification - All 703 tests pass (18 skipped) - New regression tests specifically verify the fix - Merged to main and pushed Commit: 00513bb

[QA] **CRITICAL BUG FOUND** - Feature does not work in production ## Bug Location `src/cli.py` line 455 ## Problem When a task is skipped, `execute_single_task` returns `{"status": "skipped"}`, but `execute_task_tree` only checks for `"success"`, treating "skipped" as a failure. This causes skipped tasks to be incorrectly handled. ## Evidence Created test workflow where task should skip if file exists. The file existed, but the task still executed and created error.txt with content "TASK WAS NOT SKIPPED". ## Fix Required Change line 455 from: ```python return 0 if result["status"] == "success" else 1 ``` To: ```python return 0 if result["status"] in ("success", "skipped") else 1 ``` ## Impact - Unit tests pass (36/36 skip-if tests) - Full test suite passes (701 tests) - **Integration fails**: Feature non-functional in actual workflows ## Severity HIGH - Showstopper bug. Feature is 90% implemented but completely broken in production use. See full QA report: /tmp/qa-AGEN-2.md

## 🤖 says: Implementation Complete **Summary:** Implemented file-based skip conditions to enable idempotent workflows. ### Changes Made 1. **New Module: `src/skip_conditions.py`** (~80 lines) - `FileExistsSkipCondition`: Skip if file exists at path - `FileContainsSkipCondition`: Skip if file contains text substring - `check_skip_conditions()`: Main entry point for skip checks - Template variable interpolation in all paths - Clear error messages with skip reasons to stderr 2. **Modified: `src/executor.py`** (+33 lines) - Added skip-if check BEFORE task execution (lines 82-115) - Returns `{"status": "skipped", "exit_code": 0}` when condition met - Error handling follows task's `on-error` strategy 3. **Modified: `src/validator.py`** (+80 lines) - Added `skip-if` to known meta fields - Added `_validate_skip_if_config()` method - Validates condition types (file-exists, file-contains) - Validates type-specific config (string for file-exists, dict for file-contains) 4. **New Tests: `tests/test_skip_if.py`** (36 tests) - FileExistsSkipCondition tests (4 tests) - FileContainsSkipCondition tests (8 tests) - Factory function tests (3 tests) - check_skip_conditions tests (5 tests) - SkipConditionResult tests (2 tests) - Schema validation tests (9 tests) - Executor integration tests (5 tests) 5. **New Example: `examples/30-skip-if-conditions.yaml`** - Demonstrates both condition types - Shows template variable usage 6. **Updated: `CLAUDE.md`** - Added Pre-Task Skip Conditions documentation - Updated module architecture diagram - Updated examples list ### Verification - All 36 new skip-if tests pass - All 685 existing tests pass (no regressions) - Example workflow validates successfully ### Files Changed ``` src/skip_conditions.py # NEW - 263 lines src/executor.py # +33 lines src/validator.py # +82 lines tests/test_skip_if.py # NEW - 664 lines examples/30-skip-if-conditions.yaml # NEW - 66 lines CLAUDE.md # +59 lines ``` Commit: ed3934e

## 🤖 says: Feature Triage Complete **Status:** NOT IMPLEMENTED (Feature does not exist) **Summary:** This is a new feature request for file-based skip conditions. The codebase has no existing skip-if mechanism. However, the post-task validators in `src/task_validators.py` provide an excellent pattern to follow - specifically `FileExistsValidator` and `ContainsValidator` contain 90% of the needed file-checking logic. **Implementation Location:** - New file: `src/skip_conditions.py` (~80 lines) - Modify: `src/executor.py` (~20 lines) - add skip check before task execution - Modify: `src/validator.py` (~50 lines) - schema validation - New file: `tests/test_skip_if.py` (~70 lines) **Complexity:** Low-Medium (~200 lines total, well-defined scope) **Key Finding:** The feature is already planned in `spec/planning.txt` (lines 110-123). Implementation follows established validator patterns. See full triage report: `/tmp/triage-AGEN-2.md`