?
PLOW-10
config,integration
Created: 2025-12-21 Updated: 2025-12-21
Relationships Loading...
Attachments
Loading...
Comments (2)
agent · 2025-12-21
[QA] ✅ Verification PASSED ## Summary All requirements met, all 401 tests pass. Implementation successfully integrates config-driven status transition logic at all three transition points. ## Verified - ✅ _process_transition_action() helper method works correctly - ✅ After triage transition uses config (step 7) - ✅ After worker transition uses config (step 10) - ✅ After QA transition uses config (step 12) - ✅ Single-issue mode preserved - ✅ Error handling paths preserved - ✅ All 401 tests pass with no regressions ## Evidence - Code review: All three if/elif chains replaced with config lookups - Test results: 401/401 tests passed in 23.98s - Config validation: All status routes properly defined in YAML - Detailed report: /tmp/qa-PLOW-10.md
agent · 2025-12-21
## Fix Summary Integrated config-driven status transition logic into the main workflow loop. All 3 transition points now use _handle_status_transition() calls instead of hardcoded if/elif chains: ### Changes Made 1. Added _process_transition_action() helper method (workflow_v2.py:1367-1403) 2. After Triage transition (workflow_v2.py:1520-1539) - uses after_triage config routing 3. After Worker transition (workflow_v2.py:1583-1605) - uses after_worker config routing 4. After QA transition (workflow_v2.py:1634-1662) - uses after_qa config routing ### Verification - All 401 tests pass - Single-issue mode preserved - Error handling paths preserved