?
TRCKR-189
sync testing
Created: 2025-12-08 Updated: 2025-12-16
Relationships Loading...
Attachments
Loading...
Comments (1)
agent · 2025-12-08
## Verification Complete I verified the issue sync handlers in `client/sync.py` against the SQLite schema and server API models. ### Findings **All JSON array fields are handled correctly:** 1. **`_update_from_server()` (lines 528-577)**: - Line 567: `labels` - ✓ `json.dumps(data["labels"])` - Line 570: `projects` - ✓ `json.dumps(data["projects"])` - Line 571: `repos` - ✓ `json.dumps(data["repos"])` - Line 572: `prs` - ✓ `json.dumps(data["prs"])` 2. **`_insert_from_server()` (lines 739-777)**: - Line 767: `labels` - ✓ `json.dumps(data.get("labels", []))` - Line 770: `projects` - ✓ `json.dumps(data.get("projects", []))` - Line 771: `repos` - ✓ `json.dumps(data.get("repos", []))` - Line 772: `prs` - ✓ `json.dumps(data.get("prs", []))` ### Schema Alignment - **SQLite schema** (`client/schema.py`, lines 46-49): Defines these fields as TEXT with JSON array comments - **API models** (`server/models.py`, lines 54-59): Defines them as `Optional[list[str]]` - **Sync handlers**: Correctly serialize Python lists to JSON strings using `json.dumps()` ### Test Verification Ran comprehensive tests: - `tests/test_local_store.py`: 53 tests pass - Tests CRUD with labels, projects, repos - `tests/test_live_server.py`: 15 tests pass - Tests sync operations with JSON arrays - All tests explicitly verify JSON array field handling **Result**: No bugs found. JSON array fields are correctly handled throughout the sync pipeline.