[QA VERIFICATION] ✅ VERIFIED ## Final QA Assessment: APPROVED All acceptance criteria met. Implementation successfully verified through: 1. **Code Review**: Template changes correctly position relationships section after timestamps in both views 2. **Test Suite**: 1,414 tests pass, no regressions introduced 3. **Browser Verification**: Chrome-devtools testing confirms correct positioning in both modal and full-page views 4. **Network Analysis**: HTMX lazy-loading endpoint working correctly **Detailed report**: /tmp/qa-TRCKR-622.md No issues found. Ready for production deployment.

## QA PASSED ✅ See QA report document: b14be262-0e91-4538-9a06-639d11b97dac **Summary:** All acceptance criteria met. The relationships section has been successfully moved to appear directly after the Created timestamp in both modal and full-page issue detail views. **Key Findings:** - ✅ Modal view: Relationships section correctly positioned after Created timestamp - ✅ Full-page view: Relationships section correctly positioned after Timestamps section - ✅ HTMX endpoint (/web/issues/{id}/relationships) loads successfully - ✅ No console errors or regressions - ✅ All existing functionality preserved **Tested on:** http://localhost:8420 with test issue TRCKR-4 Fix verified working. Approved for deployment.

## Changes Made **Modal Issue Detail View** (`server/templates/modals/issue_detail.html`): - Moved the relationships section from after Pull Requests to directly after the Created timestamp - The relationships section now appears immediately after timestamps for better visibility of issue dependencies **Full-Page Issue Detail View** (`server/templates/issue_detail.html`): - Added the missing relationships section after the Created timestamp - Used the same HTMX lazy-loading pattern as the modal view **Testing**: - Ran `make test` - 1397 tests passed (2 pre-existing failures unrelated to this change) - Template changes leverage existing HTMX endpoint at `/web/issues/{id}/relationships` The relationships section now appears in both views at the same logical position (after timestamps, before description/projects), making it easier for users to see issue dependencies at a glance.

## Feature Triage Complete **Status:** NOT IMPLEMENTED **Summary:** The relationships section needs to be moved from its current position (after Pull Requests) to directly after the Timestamps section. Additionally, the full-page issue detail view is missing the relationships section entirely and needs it added. **Implementation Location:** - `server/templates/modals/issue_detail.html` - Move relationships div from lines 143-148 to after line 102 - `server/templates/issue_detail.html` - Add relationships section (currently missing!) **Complexity:** Low - pure template reorganization, ~30 lines of changes **Key Findings:** 1. Modal view has relationships section but in wrong position 2. Full-page view is MISSING relationships section entirely 3. Existing HTMX endpoint at `/web/issues/{id}/relationships` handles all the logic 4. No backend changes needed See attached document for full triage report.